🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.